44. Don't Look Back, Amanda Quick
43. With This Ring, Amanda Quick
It helps that i discovered i can read hardbacks and run at the same time ... it hurts that it's the olympics and there are hours and hours of coverage to watch ;p
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
back to quick for a bit
42. Lie by moonlight, Amanda Quick
41. Deception, Amanda Quick
i didn't read either of these during my last quick phase ... i am reading the third circle again, but i won't count it toward my total :)
41. Deception, Amanda Quick
i didn't read either of these during my last quick phase ... i am reading the third circle again, but i won't count it toward my total :)
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
I'VE MADE IT TO MY ORIGINAL GOAL!
40. Sizzle and Burn, Jayne Ann Krentz
Yay! I've read 40 books this year so far. I've excited to have made it to my goal number, though with the way I had been going earlier this year, like in the summer, I almost expected to reach it sooner. But life kind of gets in the way, you know? Work and television and errands and sometimes just not feeling like reading. I've learned to abandon books that don't make me want to pick them up at every opportunity, but it's hard when you're as picky as I am about authors ... sometimes I have to settle for what I've got. Anyway, I'm going to continue on with my revised goal of 52, which means 12 more books by June 1. It seems at once like a lot, and like nothing. It's going to help that i'm visiting dana in March -- plane travel = lots of reading time. Also I have $50 more to b&n from birthday :) so that's always helpful. AQ isn't coming out with a new one til April!!! :( but suz has been releasing old ones that can keep me through hahah (and i've fully got mar hooked on her, that makes three people so far I've gotten addicted to suz ... who's next??)
Anyway the book that got me to 40: Well ... the reason I got this one was because it was on the $5.99 shelf at b&n ... the one with the popular hardbacks they ordered too many of ... It's the book before "running hot" which I read a couple months ago (Another in the Arcane society novels) I ... I don't know. I readily admit it's the type of book I get teased for. Not in that it has a lot of sex, but that it isn't well-written like I mostly defend of my novels. But I keep reading these contemporary ones in this series. Like it carried my attention through the story ... even though it was meh. Again she has the characters fall in love too quickly. There goes any tension to carry the plot. The plot involved two different arcs that were separate, yet both important (props to her for not tying them together in an easy "twist" though) But it was hard to concentrate on one (i guess hard isn't the correct word ... annoying?) when the other one was running along in the back of my mind ... It also gave us two climaxes which is awkard as a reader i think ...
But with all that said, I still read it. And I'll probably read the next ones in her series as well ... I guess I'm a sucker for the arcane.
Yay! I've read 40 books this year so far. I've excited to have made it to my goal number, though with the way I had been going earlier this year, like in the summer, I almost expected to reach it sooner. But life kind of gets in the way, you know? Work and television and errands and sometimes just not feeling like reading. I've learned to abandon books that don't make me want to pick them up at every opportunity, but it's hard when you're as picky as I am about authors ... sometimes I have to settle for what I've got. Anyway, I'm going to continue on with my revised goal of 52, which means 12 more books by June 1. It seems at once like a lot, and like nothing. It's going to help that i'm visiting dana in March -- plane travel = lots of reading time. Also I have $50 more to b&n from birthday :) so that's always helpful. AQ isn't coming out with a new one til April!!! :( but suz has been releasing old ones that can keep me through hahah (and i've fully got mar hooked on her, that makes three people so far I've gotten addicted to suz ... who's next??)
Anyway the book that got me to 40: Well ... the reason I got this one was because it was on the $5.99 shelf at b&n ... the one with the popular hardbacks they ordered too many of ... It's the book before "running hot" which I read a couple months ago (Another in the Arcane society novels) I ... I don't know. I readily admit it's the type of book I get teased for. Not in that it has a lot of sex, but that it isn't well-written like I mostly defend of my novels. But I keep reading these contemporary ones in this series. Like it carried my attention through the story ... even though it was meh. Again she has the characters fall in love too quickly. There goes any tension to carry the plot. The plot involved two different arcs that were separate, yet both important (props to her for not tying them together in an easy "twist" though) But it was hard to concentrate on one (i guess hard isn't the correct word ... annoying?) when the other one was running along in the back of my mind ... It also gave us two climaxes which is awkard as a reader i think ...
But with all that said, I still read it. And I'll probably read the next ones in her series as well ... I guess I'm a sucker for the arcane.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
HAPPY NEW YEARS!
39. The Secret, Julie Garwood
I came home for a couple of days because Dana's still home and I had four days off, so why not. But I forgot the book I was going to bring (The Wedding, JG) but never fear, the Labuskes household has a plethora of good books to choose from :)
I hadn't read the Secret in a while, I've forgotten most of it, so that's always fun. It's good and has characters from other novels I've been reading, which I always enjoy.
Her characters are just so damn likable. Maybe to a fault. But still, you just can't help but adoring them!
Anyway, off to Philadelphia for NYE with the loves of my life <3
I hope 2010 brings me more wonderful books to read, and brings everyone joy and happiness.
Peace out 2009
I came home for a couple of days because Dana's still home and I had four days off, so why not. But I forgot the book I was going to bring (The Wedding, JG) but never fear, the Labuskes household has a plethora of good books to choose from :)
I hadn't read the Secret in a while, I've forgotten most of it, so that's always fun. It's good and has characters from other novels I've been reading, which I always enjoy.
Her characters are just so damn likable. Maybe to a fault. But still, you just can't help but adoring them!
Anyway, off to Philadelphia for NYE with the loves of my life <3
I hope 2010 brings me more wonderful books to read, and brings everyone joy and happiness.
Peace out 2009
Sunday, December 27, 2009
Reading is so addictive sometimes
38. Ransom, Julie Garwood
I hadn't read this one in a very long time, and only once so it was like reading a brand new book. Which I love. As i've said before, it's not necessarily because i love the particular book so much that i read it multiple times, but that I like the style. If my fav writers wrote a new book every week, i'd be reading only those.
Anyway, another classic garwood. I think i really like the ones set in medieval scotland. out of all her locales/settings/time periods i like these the best. Oh if only they still made fierce, loyal, courageous highland lairds today. that would be nice.
One more interesting thing to note, this book was 546 pages -- which breaks my 400 page rule (in which that's usually the ideal number of pages to tell a story with out it feeling like it's dragging) This however was superb in carrying the story along! I got into the read til you finish mode, which happens when i'm really into a book -- i love it. it's delightful.
til next time, happy readings
p.s. to future self and readers: it's 2 a.m. after I've just worked and finished reading and i used no grace or style when writing this, nor did i copy edit (or use upper case consistently.) Also I used really way too many times. please ignore :D
I hadn't read this one in a very long time, and only once so it was like reading a brand new book. Which I love. As i've said before, it's not necessarily because i love the particular book so much that i read it multiple times, but that I like the style. If my fav writers wrote a new book every week, i'd be reading only those.
Anyway, another classic garwood. I think i really like the ones set in medieval scotland. out of all her locales/settings/time periods i like these the best. Oh if only they still made fierce, loyal, courageous highland lairds today. that would be nice.
One more interesting thing to note, this book was 546 pages -- which breaks my 400 page rule (in which that's usually the ideal number of pages to tell a story with out it feeling like it's dragging) This however was superb in carrying the story along! I got into the read til you finish mode, which happens when i'm really into a book -- i love it. it's delightful.
til next time, happy readings
p.s. to future self and readers: it's 2 a.m. after I've just worked and finished reading and i used no grace or style when writing this, nor did i copy edit (or use upper case consistently.) Also I used really way too many times. please ignore :D
Friday, December 25, 2009
Christmas break, reading is essential
37. Shadow Music, Julie Garwood.
I started reading Castles before break, but it just wasn't holding my attention. I love Ms. Garwood, really, but sometimes her characters get repetitive. Then I went home, and we Labuskeses, we read. So I grabbed the nearest Garwood (a much chewed on copy of Shadow Music, from back when Keelie was a neurotic mess that hid under the bed -- oh waittt) and dived in. Classic Garwood. Set in Scotland. Fast-paced and cute. My only complaint is she's a little in love with the, not back story and not quite secondary characters, just I guess what's going on with everyone else in the book. For example, the hero and heroine don't even meet until 150 pages in. What the what?! lol.
This was her newest historical fiction (she came out with a contemporary one that was HORRIBLE I couldn't even finish it it was so bad -- she should stick with what she does best) and I've only read it once before, so I didn't remember some of it which is always fun :)
No new books for Xmas, but I did grab Ransom (JG) and Three Cups of Tea (which dane dane raves about) so maybe they're up next?
MERRY CHRISTMAS and happy readings! :D
I started reading Castles before break, but it just wasn't holding my attention. I love Ms. Garwood, really, but sometimes her characters get repetitive. Then I went home, and we Labuskeses, we read. So I grabbed the nearest Garwood (a much chewed on copy of Shadow Music, from back when Keelie was a neurotic mess that hid under the bed -- oh waittt) and dived in. Classic Garwood. Set in Scotland. Fast-paced and cute. My only complaint is she's a little in love with the, not back story and not quite secondary characters, just I guess what's going on with everyone else in the book. For example, the hero and heroine don't even meet until 150 pages in. What the what?! lol.
This was her newest historical fiction (she came out with a contemporary one that was HORRIBLE I couldn't even finish it it was so bad -- she should stick with what she does best) and I've only read it once before, so I didn't remember some of it which is always fun :)
No new books for Xmas, but I did grab Ransom (JG) and Three Cups of Tea (which dane dane raves about) so maybe they're up next?
MERRY CHRISTMAS and happy readings! :D
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Let me introduce Ms. Julie Garwood
36.Honor's Splendor, Julie Garwood
35. Lyon's Lady, Julie Garwood
So after reading JAK's book I discussed with mutti how strange it was that her historical novels are so much better than her contemporary ones. And then she brought up Julie Garwood, one of her all-time favorite historical writers. Like AQ/JAK she writes in both historical and contemporary (though uses her name for both, a point for rationality there.) Mutti ferverently believes that there is a huge disparity between the two. And while I don't have as strong of feelings on her contemporary novels, I agree.
Most writers have a mold they use for their hero/heorine. If you read enough of the same author you'll notice a pattern. The most obvious abuse of this is Nora (I do criticize her a lot don't I?) Julie Garwood is not an exception. Her (historical) heroines are always ridiculously courageous, demure when appropriate, skilled at something unusual and enchanting just to name a few characteristics. I do however think she varies these basics well enough that I never tire of reading her books in a row. Her characters are very loveable. And you kind of wish you had their hutzpah sometimes as well.
Something unusual she does is have the characters admit they love each other about 3/4 the way through at the latest. Most romances-centric novels wait til the end. But still her plots are intriguing enough to carry it along anyway.
Another thing that sets her apart is that she doesn't write in one historical time period. Most romance writers who set their characters in the past tend to stick to one time period. The most common being the Regency Era -- replete with rakes and misses and the ton. High society. The second most common is Scotland during the middle ages -- 1400s ish. Anyway they tend not to deviate. She sets hers throughout the ages, which is disconcerting at times only because it's unique.
Julie Garwood is a lovely writer. Both books sucked me in to the point I'v spent the last two days straight reading them -- or thinking about finishing them. I love that feeling. That excitement to pick up my book, the nagging desire at work for the clock to tick by quicker so I can get back to reading. That might make me a little silly. Oh well.
I've read both these books before, but it had been a while for Lyon's Lady. Enough that I'd forgotten most of the story. I read Honor's Splendor all the time because it's one of my favorites by her.
I get a lot of flak for rereading books -- yes i know there are a ton out there -- but I was thinking about that while rereading these. It's not necessarily that I enjoy reading the same book twice. Save for a few I don't usually crave a certain story, usually I just want that type of story. That type of writing. That type of character. Unfortunately writers don't pump out books like tv shows -- a new one every week. Usually they only come out with two a year. So, since I've been reading so voraciously for so long I've not only discovered the authors I like I've caught up on all their work. Hence the rereads.
Anyway enough blathering. Happy thanksgiving!
35. Lyon's Lady, Julie Garwood
So after reading JAK's book I discussed with mutti how strange it was that her historical novels are so much better than her contemporary ones. And then she brought up Julie Garwood, one of her all-time favorite historical writers. Like AQ/JAK she writes in both historical and contemporary (though uses her name for both, a point for rationality there.) Mutti ferverently believes that there is a huge disparity between the two. And while I don't have as strong of feelings on her contemporary novels, I agree.
Most writers have a mold they use for their hero/heorine. If you read enough of the same author you'll notice a pattern. The most obvious abuse of this is Nora (I do criticize her a lot don't I?) Julie Garwood is not an exception. Her (historical) heroines are always ridiculously courageous, demure when appropriate, skilled at something unusual and enchanting just to name a few characteristics. I do however think she varies these basics well enough that I never tire of reading her books in a row. Her characters are very loveable. And you kind of wish you had their hutzpah sometimes as well.
Something unusual she does is have the characters admit they love each other about 3/4 the way through at the latest. Most romances-centric novels wait til the end. But still her plots are intriguing enough to carry it along anyway.
Another thing that sets her apart is that she doesn't write in one historical time period. Most romance writers who set their characters in the past tend to stick to one time period. The most common being the Regency Era -- replete with rakes and misses and the ton. High society. The second most common is Scotland during the middle ages -- 1400s ish. Anyway they tend not to deviate. She sets hers throughout the ages, which is disconcerting at times only because it's unique.
Julie Garwood is a lovely writer. Both books sucked me in to the point I'v spent the last two days straight reading them -- or thinking about finishing them. I love that feeling. That excitement to pick up my book, the nagging desire at work for the clock to tick by quicker so I can get back to reading. That might make me a little silly. Oh well.
I've read both these books before, but it had been a while for Lyon's Lady. Enough that I'd forgotten most of the story. I read Honor's Splendor all the time because it's one of my favorites by her.
I get a lot of flak for rereading books -- yes i know there are a ton out there -- but I was thinking about that while rereading these. It's not necessarily that I enjoy reading the same book twice. Save for a few I don't usually crave a certain story, usually I just want that type of story. That type of writing. That type of character. Unfortunately writers don't pump out books like tv shows -- a new one every week. Usually they only come out with two a year. So, since I've been reading so voraciously for so long I've not only discovered the authors I like I've caught up on all their work. Hence the rereads.
Anyway enough blathering. Happy thanksgiving!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
